11 Sep Antecedent Agreement Error
It should be clear to whom or what the pronoun represents. If you have a sentence in which the precursor of the pronoun is unclear, your reader will probably be confused. Let`s take the following example: instead of accepting the aliens` offer to buy, people rejected it and tried in vain to defend themselves. No error The original sentence contains an error in the concordance of noun pronouns: the plural possessive pronoun “you” is used to refer to “the worker”, a singular noun. We must use a singular possessive pronoun to refer to a singular noun, and our decisions in this case are “hers,” “her,” and “she.” It is not used to refer to people, and while “the worker” is not a gender name, we can say that the worker described in the sentence is a man because the possessive pronoun “to be” in the sentences “his lost green helmet” and “made himself happy on the way home.” For the sentence to be correct, we must replace “theirs” with “his”, so that the correct answer is: “Just when he finished the work for the day, the worker found his lost green helmet and got happy on the way home.” This university is particularly known for its strong film program and commitment to the creative arts. No mistake Another situation to pay attention to are implicit pronouns. Remember that the precursor must be present in the sentence. No error The precursor is the noun or pronoun that replaced the pronoun. The pronoun must correspond to the precursor in number (plural or singular) and sex (male or female).
Here is an example that shows the correct pronoun-precursor concordance: Note that it is clear what is the precursor of each of the pronouns: she (the student), she (the student), she (the work). This sentence contains a discrepancy in the concordance of the plurelle. “University” is a singular noun, not a plural noun, so the correct possessive pronoun should be “”, not “she”. There must be a noun or pronoun inside the sentence that can serve as a precursor. Pronouns, that, that and that can lead to a vague reference to the pronoun when they relate to something that was mentioned earlier in another sentence: the mayor has often proposed reductions in turnover tax because buyers can benefit from them when they buy.