16 Dic Santa Ana Community Workforce Agreement
The agreement is with the Los Angeles/Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council, which represents about 140,000 workers in dozens of unions. In the past fiscal year, the city had at least $27 million in contracts that would meet the threshold of the agreement. The contract limits non-unionized contractors to contractors with five or fewer employees. Larger non-unionized entrepreneurs already have a workforce they know and trust, but to apply for a city project, they must employ union hiring hall workers. Most companies simply will not offer for these jobs. In this way, unions use political muscles to put their competitors aside. You will also receive urban micromanagement contracts. The people of the city will not benefit. There are all kinds of problems with these agreements and the Santa Ana process. THE LSAs require construction workers to source from union pension funds, but few will have enough years of work.
That`s right? The City employee report estimates that “this agreement will add an additional 10 to 20 per cent for public works in construction.” The report says that this can be between $2.7 million and an additional $5.4 million per year. This is real money that could be used for real projects in a city that often has serious budget problems. The people of Santa Ana should be upset by this “generosity.” The Community Work Agreement aims to ensure that at least 35% of work on larger urban projects is carried out by people living in Anaheim or Orange County. graduates of the city`s high schools; Are veterans and economically disadvantaged residents, such as former homeless people. After expressing support for the agreement, Medrano asked dozens of trade members in the Council chambers to surrender. “Even if there were additional costs, I think it will be offset by the benefits it brings to our community, with jobs, with work, with people who spend money in our city and keep the dollars on the ground… and keep people at work,” he said. Of the more than 100 people who spoke at the meeting, most were in favour of the agreement, but some objected because people who learned construction skills through apprenticeship programs that were not union-related would not be eligible for employment.